![]() | ||||||
| Home | Past Issues | Submission Guidelines | Reviewer's Page | About the Editor | NREA Homepage | ||||||
|
Volume 31, Issue 1 Fall 2009 Table of Contents
Rural and
Small School Principal Candidates:
ABSTRACT:
This article reports the results of an inquiry into the dynamics of
principal selection in rural school districts in two mid-American states
with high numbers of rural schools. The study focuses on two questions:
(1) are rural school districts experiencing a shortage of qualified
applicants for vacant principal’s positions; and (2) what professional
and personal characteristics do superintendents seek in selecting
principals for rural schools? Data for the study were collected through
a review of the relevant research literature and interviews with
superintendents of rural school districts. The study confirmed that
rural school districts in these two states are in fact not experiencing
a shortage of qualified principal applicants and delineates specific
professional and personal characteristics superintendents seek in the
principals who lead rural schools.
Job
Satisfaction of Iowa Public School Principals . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. 10
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to examine the job satisfaction of Iowa
public school principals and contrast the job satisfaction to the
perceptions six years previously.
The population for the 1999 and 2005 study was a sample of principals
from Iowa K-12 schools.
The study revealed significant differences in overall job satisfaction,
in gender of the principals, years served as a principal, and type of
schools in both studies. No significant differences were found for years
served in present position. The results indicated that principals were
overall more satisfied in the 2005 than they were in 1999. The findings
confirmed that principals spent more time on the management of their
schools than on leadership tasks. Principals were more satisfied with
hygiene factors than with motivators in both studies. Impact of No Child Left Behind on Curriculum and Instruction in Rural Schools . 19 Deborah Powell, Heidi J. Higgins, Roberta Aram and Andrea Freed
ABSTRACT:
This article examines the influence of the No Child Left Behind Act on
the decision making of rural principals and teachers about curriculum
and instruction as well as the possible long-term effects on rural
education. Data were gathered from 101 rural elementary school
principals in Missouri and 76 rural elementary school
teachers in Maine. Missouri principals were concerned about
losing their autonomy and abilities to be instructional leaders. Maine
teachers reported that NCLB benefited some groups of students more than
others and that it has a negative effect on student motivation. There
were significant changes in instructional time for some subjects and
non-instructional time for recess and kindergarten nap time. The most
important influence on principals’ educational vision for the future and
the need for professional development was meeting AYP and raising test
scores.
Supporting On-line Learning for Advanced
Placement
ABSTRACT:
This paper examines the need for interventions to
support students who are taking advanced placement courses in small
rural districts and describes the Facilitator Preparation Program (FPP)
as a strategy to address this need. Issues in the delivery of Online
Distance Education (ODE) in small rural schools are summarized and the
conceptual foundations and service delivery considerations of the FPP
are outlined. Future research needs are also considered.
ABSTRACT: By means of a qualitative research method known as folknography, a concerted effort was made to discern perceptions of math and math education in the rural Midwest. A community that will be referred to as Midville, located in the state of Illinois, was chosen as the target population for this study. The community and surrounding region stands over one hundred miles from the nearest metro complex. The study was conducted in May of 2006. After completion of the initial field work, data were collected, analyzed, and summarized, producing this document.
|
|
| ||||
|
The Rural Educator © 2009 R. M. Roberts, Webmaster | ||||||